Re: [dummy-irq] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 0. 00000080 (dummy_irq) vs. 00015a20 (timer)

[Fengguang Wu]

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> 
> > This patch is found to trigger a call trace dump during kernel boot.
> > Can it be possibly fixed? Thanks!
> 
> Hi Fengguang,
> 
> from the dmesg it's obvious that dummy-irq is requesting IRQ#0 by default. 
> This has been fixed back in 2013 via commit a7b594b490. Are you sure you 
> have that commit applied?

Ah yes! Sorry I looked at the wrong line of the table.. it becomes
obvious when listing the dummy_irq line alone: it no longer shows up
in next-20140905.

+------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+---------------+
|                                                      | 4c6e22b8a9 | 54f69b92f0 | next-20140905 |
+------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+---------------+

| genirq:Flags_mismatch_irq.(dummy_irq)vs.(timer)      | 0          | 20         |               |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/