Re: [PATCH] regulator: remove unnecessary of_node_get() to parent
From: Axel Lin
Date: Wed Sep 10 2014 - 00:20:09 EST
2014-09-10 11:50 GMT+08:00 Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> These of_node_get() were added to balance refcount decrements inside of
> of_find_node_by_name().
> See: commit c92f5dd2c42f ("regulator: Add missing of_node_put()")
>
> However of_find_node_by_name() was then replaced by of_get_child_by_name(),
> which doesn't call of_node_put() against its input parameter.
>
> So, need to remove these unnecessary of_node_get() calls.
The of_node_get() and of_node_put() is a pair.
You need to either keep both or remove both.
BTW,
I think either the comment of of_get_child_by_name() needs fix or the
implementation
needs fix. The implementation does not increment refcount.
/**
* of_get_child_by_name - Find the child node by name for a given parent
* @node: parent node
* @name: child name to look for.
*
* This function looks for child node for given matching name
*
* Returns a node pointer if found, with refcount incremented, use
* of_node_put() on it when done.
* Returns NULL if node is not found.
*/
struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(const struct device_node *node,
const char *name)
{
struct device_node *child;
for_each_child_of_node(node, child)
if (child->name && (of_node_cmp(child->name, name) == 0))
break;
return child;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_child_by_name);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/