Re: [PATCH] mm/sl[aou]b: make kfree() aware of error pointers
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Wed Sep 10 2014 - 10:42:16 EST
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > I of course have no objections to this check being added to whatever
> > static checker, that would be very welcome improvement.
> >
> > Still, I believe that kernel shouldn't be just ignoring kfree(ERR_PTR)
> > happening. Would something like the below be more acceptable?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm/sl[aou]b: make kfree() aware of error pointers
> >
> > Freeing if ERR_PTR is not covered by ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR() check already
> > present in kfree(), but it happens in the wild and has disastrous effects.
> >
> > Issue a warning and don't proceed trying to free the memory if
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is set.
> >
>
> This won't work cause CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is only for CONFIG_SLAB=y
>
> How about just VM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ptr)); ?
VM_BUG_ON() makes very little sense to me, as we are going to oops anyway
later, so it's a lose-lose situation.
VM_WARN_ON() + return seems like much more reasonable choice.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/