Re: [PATCH] KVM: EVENTFD: remove inclusion of irq.h

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 11/09/2014 05:09, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto:
>>> No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However
>>> I did not compile for all architectures.
>>> ---
>>>  virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 -
>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>>> index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>>> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
>>>  #include <linux/seqlock.h>
>>>  #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>>>  
>>> -#include "irq.h"
>>>  #include "iodev.h"
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM
>> irqfd support.  Thanks,
>>
> Marc is dealing with the tree this week and the next so he can apply it
> to kvmarm/queue.  Do you want it to wait and go with the irqfd patch
> (which has dependencies not yet resolved) or should we just queue it?

As you prefer.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/