Re: [PATCH V4] pwm: lpc32xx - Add a driver for the motor PWM

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Thu Sep 11 2014 - 05:40:06 EST


On Thursday 11 September 2014 10:36:21 Alban Bedel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:28:39 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 10 September 2014 17:59:41 Alban Bedel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:51:36 +0200
> > > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday 10 September 2014 17:43:42 Alban Bedel wrote:
> > > > > +- #pwm-cells: should be 3. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
> > > > > + the cells format. The only third cell flag supported by this binding is
> > > > > + PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
> > > >
> > > > If you don't have multiple pwm outputs or programmable period, I would say it
> > > > should use #pwm-cells=<1> and only pass the polarity.
> > >
> > > There is 3 channel, so 3 PWM from the API POV, and the period is
> > > independently programmable for each one.
> >
> > Then you should put the channel number into the first cell and the period
> > length into the second cell, as the pwm.txt document says.
>
> That's what is implemented in this patch, by using
> of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() for the .of_xlate callback.
>

Ah, my mistake. I misread the sentence in the binding for meaning that
you only support the third cell. It's all good then.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/