[PATCH 3.2 119/131] sparc64: ldc_connect() should not return EINVAL when handshake is in progress.

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 4ec1b01029b4facb651b8ef70bc20a4be4cebc63 ]

The LDC handshake could have been asynchronously triggered
after ldc_bind() enables the ldc_rx() receive interrupt-handler
(and thus intercepts incoming control packets)
and before vio_port_up() calls ldc_connect(). If that is the case,
ldc_connect() should return 0 and let the state-machine
progress.

Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Karl Volz <karl.volz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
index 435e406..1beaf60 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ int ldc_connect(struct ldc_channel *lp)
 	if (!(lp->flags & LDC_FLAG_ALLOCED_QUEUES) ||
 	    !(lp->flags & LDC_FLAG_REGISTERED_QUEUES) ||
 	    lp->hs_state != LDC_HS_OPEN)
-		err = -EINVAL;
+		err = ((lp->hs_state > LDC_HS_OPEN) ? 0 : -EINVAL);
 	else
 		err = start_handshake(lp);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/