Re: [RFC][PATCH] signal: replace !likely with unlikely!

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:48:16AM +0800, roy.qing.li@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@xxxxxxxxx> 
> 
> !likely() is hard to be understood, and I do not know if compiler can
> optimise this condition, but unlikely(!()) is clear
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/signal.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 8f0876f..6156cfa 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, int group)
>  	BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC));
>  
>  	ret = -1;
> -	if (!likely(lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
> +	if (unlikely(!lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))

I wonder if you tested this code. Seems to be unlikely (punt not intended).

Guenter

>  		goto ret;
>  
>  	ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/