Re: [PATCH V2] ASoC: fsl_ssi: refine ipg clock usage in this module

[Shengjiu Wang]

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:54:46AM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:14:28PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:17:06AM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:01:12AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:57:37PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:38:29PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > > > > Move the ipg clock enable and disable operation to startup and shutdown,
> > > > > > that is only enable ipg clock when ssi is working. Keep clock is disabled
> > > > > > when ssi is in idle.
> > > > > > otherwise, _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt function need to be called in probe,
> > > > > > so add ipg clock control for it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It seems to be no objection so far against my last suggestion to
> > > > > use regmap's mmio_clk() for named ipg clk only. So you may still
> > > > > consider about that.
> > > > >
> > > > I think mmio_clk() can be put to another patch. and this patch only for clk_enable()
> > > > and clk_disable() operation.
> > > 
> > > I would also prefer Nicolin's suggestion using regmap's mmio clk. I
> > > think it may be better to not add this particular patch at all and just
> > > go with the mmio_clk patch. It should be easy enough to just add the
> > > clock names to the devicetrees. That way we can avoid all those clock
> > > enable/disable function calls.
> > >
> > I considered if use Nicolin's suggestion, I still need ot add those
> > enable/disable function calls, because I want to remove the enable/disable
> > function call in fsl_ssi_imx_probe, then I need to add enable/disable 
> > function call in _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt(), which is called in fsl_ssi_probe().
> > _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt() need to access the registers.
> 
> I think Nicolin's suggestion was to check for a clock named "ipg". If it
> exists, you can simply use devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(). Otherwise you
> could fallback to the old behaviour and get the first clock and enable
> it without disabling it after the probe function.
> 
> After that, you could add the clock-names property to the devicetrees
> and have the same result.
>
Ok, I have sent V3 for review. please check.

wang shengjiu 
> > 
> > > >  
> > > > > Anyway, I'd like to do thing in parallel. So I just simply tested
> > > > > it on my side and its works fine, it may still need to be tested
> > > > > by others though.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Nicolina
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Markus
> > > > 
> > > > could you please review it, and share your comments?
> > > 
> > > I think the clock enabling for AC97 is missing in your patch.
> > > 
> > I add clock enable in fsl_ssi_startup(), I think it is enough for AC97, does it?
> 
> No. We export ac97 read/write ops for the whole AC97 stuff. These may be
> used outside of the usual startup/shutdown which is done for substreams.
> It may work to have the ipg clock enabled in
> fsl_ssi_ac97_read/fsl_ssi_ac97_write.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Markus
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/