Re: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq work on tick v2

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:33:20PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > Frederic Weisbecker (7):
> >       nohz: Move nohz full init call to tick init
> >       irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt
> >       x86: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >       arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >       arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >       nohz: Consolidate nohz full init code
> >       nohz: nohz full depends on irq work self IPI support
> > 
> > Peter Zijlstra (1):
> >       irq_work: Introduce arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()
> 
> Looks ok to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Intel? :-) Wow.

Thanks a lot!

Note, I fear I'll have to turn the static_cpu_has into cpu_has. The
alternatives code which initialize all static_cpu_has() things
is called from check_bugs() in start_kernel() which is way after
IRQs are enabled for the 1st time. irq_work_tick() has many opportunities
to run in between.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/