Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: proc: use seq_open_private()

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:36 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>   fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()
>   fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()

See the problem?  We have two different patches, both named the same.

I renamed them to

	fs/proc/task_nommu.c: use __seq_open_private()
	fs/proc/task_mmu.c: use __seq_open_private()

I really don't understand this practice of replacing "/" with ": " in
patch titles.  Why not just use the "/"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/