Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: proc: use seq_open_private()

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:21:45 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/09/14 22:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:36 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>    fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()
> >>    fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()
> >
> > See the problem?  We have two different patches, both named the same.
> 
> Always another gotcha! :-)
> 
> Seriously, does it say anywhere that patch names have to be unique? It
> makes perfect sense when it's pointed out but it never occurred to me.

Not explicitly as far as I know.  Documentation/SubmittingPatches
implies it.  Search for "unique".

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/