Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c: Correct the comments for xenbus_grant_ring()

From: David Vrabel
Date: Mon Sep 15 2014 - 11:28:07 EST


On 14/09/14 11:50, Chen Gang wrote:
> Both zero and positive number can indicate success, so the original
> comments need be improved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c
> index 277e74d..e2cf681 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c
> @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ static void xenbus_switch_fatal(struct xenbus_device *dev, int depth, int err,
> * @ring_mfn: mfn of ring to grant
>
> * Grant access to the given @ring_mfn to the peer of the given device. Return
> - * 0 on success, or -errno on error. On error, the device will switch to
> - * XenbusStateClosing, and the error will be saved in the store.
> + * 0 or positive number on success, or -errno on error. On error, the device
> + * will switch to XenbusStateClosing, and the error will be saved in the store.

If you're going to update this comment, please state what it is actually
returning: i.e., a grant reference or -ve on error.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/