[PATCH 3.14 078/114] get rid of propagate_umount() mistakenly treating slaves as busy.

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 88b368f27a094277143d8ecd5a056116f6a41520 upstream.

The check in __propagate_umount() ("has somebody explicitly mounted
something on that slave?") is done *before* taking the already doomed
victims out of the child lists.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/namespace.c |    4 +++-
 fs/pnode.c     |    1 +
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1253,6 +1253,9 @@ void umount_tree(struct mount *mnt, int
 		hlist_add_head(&p->mnt_hash, &tmp_list);
 	}
 
+	hlist_for_each_entry(p, &tmp_list, mnt_hash)
+		list_del_init(&p->mnt_child);
+
 	if (how)
 		propagate_umount(&tmp_list);
 
@@ -1263,7 +1266,6 @@ void umount_tree(struct mount *mnt, int
 		p->mnt_ns = NULL;
 		if (how < 2)
 			p->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT;
-		list_del_init(&p->mnt_child);
 		if (mnt_has_parent(p)) {
 			put_mountpoint(p->mnt_mp);
 			/* move the reference to mountpoint into ->mnt_ex_mountpoint */
--- a/fs/pnode.c
+++ b/fs/pnode.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ static void __propagate_umount(struct mo
 		 * other children
 		 */
 		if (child && list_empty(&child->mnt_mounts)) {
+			list_del_init(&child->mnt_child);
 			hlist_del_init_rcu(&child->mnt_hash);
 			hlist_add_before_rcu(&child->mnt_hash, &mnt->mnt_hash);
 		}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/