Re: [PATCH 2/4] usb: hub: remove obsolete while cycle in hub_event()
From: Alan Stern
Date: Wed Sep 17 2014 - 12:01:52 EST
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Petr [iso-8859-1] Mlák wrote:
> On Fri 12-09-14 10:23:26, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > > The USB hub events are proceed by workqueue instead of kthread now.
> > > The result is that hub_event() function processes only one event.
> > > The while cycle was not removed earlier to show the real changes when
> > > switching to the workqueue.
> > >
> > > This patch also consolidates the goto targets and rename them from "loop*"
> > > to "out*".
> > >
> > > When touching the code, it fixes also formatting of dev_err() and dev_dbg()
> > > calls to make checkpatch.pl happy :-)
> >
> > Although the reason given in the description above is not really
> > accurate, removing the loop in hub_events is a reasonable thing to do.
> > That loop doesn't serve any purpose as far as I can see.
>
> IMHO, the while cycle was needed when hub_events() was used in
> khubd thread. More events could had been added to the list before
> the thread was scheduled.
There's nothing wrong with that. The thread would get around to
executing the extra events in due course.
> Therefore I think that the above description makes sense.
>
> And this is why I did not change the order of the patches in v2 of the patch
> set. I sent all patches again because this one and the 3rd one needed
> refresh.
The patch is getting close. There are still a couple of problems
remaining. I'll go into more detail in another email.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/