Re: [ PATCH ] Remove numa_balancing sysctl dependence on CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed Sep 24 2014 - 00:50:45 EST


John Blackwood <john.blackwood@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> numa: numa_balancing sysctl scope change
>
> Make the 'numa_balancing' sysctl parameter no longer dependent upon
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG so it can be used in non-debug kernels.

Looks good.
-Andi

>
> Signed-off-by: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Index: b/kernel/sysctl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> },
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> {
> .procname = "numa_balancing",
> .data = NULL, /* filled in by handler */
> @@ -399,7 +402,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
> {
> .procname = "sched_rt_period_us",
> .data = &sysctl_sched_rt_period,

--
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/