Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Userspace software event and ioctl

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 15:34 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > This patch adds a PERF_COUNT_SW_USERSPACE_EVENT type,
> > which can be generated by user with PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENTRY
> > ioctl command, which injects an event of said type into
> > the perf buffer.
> 
> It occurred to me last night that currently perf doesn't handle "write"
> syscall at all, while this seems like the most natural way of
> "injecting" userspace events into perf buffer.
> 
> An ioctl would still be needed to set a type of the following events,
> something like:
> 
> 	ioctl(SET_TYPE, 0x42);
> 	write(perf_fd, binaryblob, size);
> 	ioctl(SET_TYPE, 0);
> 	dprintf(perf_fd, "String");
> 
> which is fine for use cases when the type doesn't change often, 
> but would double the amount of syscalls when every single event 
> is of a different type. Perhaps there still should be a 
> "generating ioctl" taking both type and data/size in one go?

Absolutely, there should be a single syscall.

I'd even argue it should be a new prctl(): that way we could both 
generate user events for specific perf fds, but also into any 
currently active context (that allows just generation/injection 
of user events). In the latter case we might have no fd to work 
off from.

And that is actually the really exciting usecase of your patches: 
we could generate user events via simple commands, and any 
external profiler/trace would be able to see them.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/