Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 0/5] netns: allow to identify peer netns

From: Nicolas Dichtel
Date: Wed Sep 24 2014 - 05:23:34 EST


Le 23/09/2014 21:22, Cong Wang a Ãcrit :
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
<nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Here is a small screenshot to show how it can be used by userland:
$ ip netns add foo
$ ip netns del foo
$ ip netns
$ touch /var/run/netns/init_net
$ mount --bind /proc/1/ns/net /var/run/netns/init_net
$ ip netns add foo
$ ip netns
foo (id: 3)
init_net (id: 1)
$ ip netns exec foo ip netns
foo (id: 3)
init_net (id: 1)
$ ip netns exec foo ip link add ipip1 link-netnsid 1 type ipip remote 10.16.0.121 local 10.16.0.249
$ ip netns exec foo ip l ls ipip1
6: ipip1@NONE: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default
link/ipip 10.16.0.249 peer 10.16.0.121 link-netnsid 1

The parameter link-netnsid shows us where the interface sends and receives
packets (and thus we know where encapsulated addresses are set).


So ipip1 is shown in netns foo but functioning in netns init_net? Getting the
id of init_net in foo depends on your mount namespace, /var/run/netns/ may
not visible inside foo, in this case, link-netnsid is meaningless. It
is not your
fault, network namespace already heavily relies on mount namespace (sysfs
needs to be remount otherwise you can not create device with the same name.)

On the other hand, what's the problem you are trying to solve? AFAIK,
the ifindex
issue is purely in output, IOW, the device still functions correctly
even through
its link ifindex is not correct after moving to another namespace. If
not, it is bug
we need to fix.

The problem is explained here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/315933/focus=316064
and here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/28301/focus=4239


Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/