[tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Clear dl_entity params when setscheduling to different class
From: tip-bot for Juri Lelli
Date: Wed Sep 24 2014 - 11:13:44 EST
Commit-ID: a5e7be3b28a235108c59561bea55eea1072b23b0
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a5e7be3b28a235108c59561bea55eea1072b23b0
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:22:39 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:46:56 +0200
sched/deadline: Clear dl_entity params when setscheduling to different class
When a task is using SCHED_DEADLINE and the user setschedules it to a
different class its sched_dl_entity static parameters are not cleaned
up. This causes a bug if the user sets it back to SCHED_DEADLINE with
the same parameters again. The problem resides in the check we
perform at the very beginning of dl_overflow():
if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
return 0;
This condition is met in the case depicted above, so the function
returns and dl_b->total_bw is not updated (the p->dl.dl_bw is not
added to it). After this, admission control is broken.
This patch fixes the thing, properly clearing static parameters for a
task that ceases to use SCHED_DEADLINE.
Reported-by: Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Vincent Legout <vincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Vincent Legout <vincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411118561-26323-2-git-send-email-juri.lelli@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 ++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a284190..09bde2a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1809,6 +1809,20 @@ int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state)
}
/*
+ * This function clears the sched_dl_entity static params.
+ */
+void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+
+ dl_se->dl_runtime = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_deadline = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_period = 0;
+ dl_se->flags = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_bw = 0;
+}
+
+/*
* Perform scheduler related setup for a newly forked process p.
* p is forked by current.
*
@@ -1832,10 +1846,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->dl.rb_node);
hrtimer_init(&p->dl.dl_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
- p->dl.dl_runtime = p->dl.runtime = 0;
- p->dl.dl_deadline = p->dl.deadline = 0;
- p->dl.dl_period = 0;
- p->dl.flags = 0;
+ __dl_clear_params(p);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rt.run_list);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index aaa5abb..efb9412 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.dl_timer) && !dl_policy(p->policy))
hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
+ __dl_clear_params(p);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Since this might be the only -deadline task on the rq,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1bc6aad..76f3a38 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ struct rt_bandwidth {
u64 rt_runtime;
struct hrtimer rt_period_timer;
};
+
+void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p);
+
/*
* To keep the bandwidth of -deadline tasks and groups under control
* we need some place where:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/