Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant
From: Zefan Li
Date: Wed Sep 24 2014 - 21:42:32 EST
On 2014/9/24 21:35, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:22:18AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:44:19PM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
>>> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
>>> defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
>>> because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.
>>>
>>> Note this changes the bit position of PFA_NOW_NEW_PRIVS from 1 to 0.
>>>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [ lizf: slightly modified subject and changelog ]
>>> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Applied 1-3 to cgroup/for-3.17-fixes w/ the typo spotted by davidr
>> fixed.
>
> Reverted due to build failure. Will wait for a refreshed version. :(
>
Didn't notice mm/slab.c uses PF_SPREAD_SLAB without the cpuset wrapper...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/