Hi Kukjin,
On 25.09.2014 10:26, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 09/25/14 17:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]Thanks and just note the branch which is including this change actually
v4 is just rebased not v3 will be sent out to arm-soc last tonight or
tomorrow.
It's possible, but would be better that DT changes are sent to upstream through samsung/arm-soc tree?...we suffered ugly conflicts between arm-soc and driver before and then we decided DT changes should be handled in arm-soc...Hmm...
Could you keep this patch in a separate stable branch, so I could pull
it as a dependency for Thomas Abraham's cpufreq series?