Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device

[Johan Hovold]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:43:17PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:

Where's the commit message body?

> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/viperboard.c       | 1 -
>  include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> index 57fac1d..1e7c316 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
>  
>  	/* save our data pointer in this interface device */
>  	usb_set_intfdata(interface, vb);
> -	dev_set_drvdata(&vb->pdev.dev, vb);

This looks ok, as the subdrivers are accessing the driver data via the
usb-interface (their parent) device.

You verified that too, right?

>  
>  	/* get version information, major first, minor then */
>  	pipe = usb_rcvctrlpipe(vb->usb_dev, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> index af928d0..afc14ed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> @@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ struct vprbrd {
>  	struct usb_device *usb_dev; /* the usb device for this device */
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	u8 *buf;
> -	struct platform_device pdev;
>  };
>  
>  #endif /* __MFD_VIPERBOARD_H__ */

Still feels like the kind of clean up that should have a Tested-by.

Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/