Re: [PATCHv4 4/7] hwspinlock/core: add common OF helpers

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Fri Sep 26 2014 - 10:40:41 EST


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch adds three new OF helper functions to use/request
> locks from a hwspinlock device instantiated through a
> device-tree blob.
>

Hi Ohad, Suman

I'm about to send out some patches that depends on this functionality,
how do we move forward?

I still think it's wrong to not return -EPROBE_DEFER, but I much
rather have the code returning NULL than not having it in the tree (we
can always argue about it later...).

@Suman, do you remember if there was any other comments on the patch?

@Ohad, do you object merging Suman's patch in it's current form? I
think it should still apply cleanly.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/