Re: [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional

From: Vinod Koul
Date: Sun Sep 28 2014 - 12:37:27 EST


On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Nowadays, some drivers don't have anything in there channel allocation
> callbacks anymore.
>
> Remove the BUG_ON if those callbacks aren't implemented, in order to allow
> drivers to not implement them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index d5d30ed863ce..cfcb181b1184 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
> BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> !device->device_prep_interleaved_dma);
>
> - BUG_ON(!device->device_alloc_chan_resources);
> - BUG_ON(!device->device_free_chan_resources);
Dont think we have drivers without free. IIRC cppi one might be only
instance

--
~Vinod
> BUG_ON(!device->device_tx_status);
> BUG_ON(!device->device_issue_pending);
> BUG_ON(!device->dev);
> --
> 2.1.0
>

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/