Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
From: Matt Fleming
Date: Wed Sep 24 2014 - 09:18:31 EST
On Wed, 24 Sep, at 03:08:16PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * There's no way to return an informative status from this function,
> > + * because any analysis (and printing of error messages) needs to be
> > + * done directly at the EFI function call-site.
> > + *
> > + * For example, EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER could indicate a bug or maybe we
> > + * just didn't find any PCI devices, but there's no way to tell outside
> > + * the context of the call.
> > + */
> > +static void setup_efi_pci(struct boot_params *params)
> Btw., do we print proper complaints at the EFI call sites if such
> failures do happen (and if that failure is unexpected/bad)?
Not yet, but I've got a patch queued up for v3.18 that does this.
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/