Re: [PATCH 3/3] UBI: Fix possible deadlock in erase_worker()
From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Fri Sep 26 2014 - 06:40:54 EST
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 10:45 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> If sync_erase() fails with EINTR, ENOMEM, EAGAIN or
> EBUSY erase_worker() re-schedules the failed work.
> This will lead to a deadlock because erase_worker() is called
> with work_sem held in read mode. And schedule_erase() will take
> this lock again.
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Did you manage to test it?
Why no -stable this time? Not that important, or just something
theoretical and you never actually hit this bug?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/