Re: [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build
From: Jonas Bonn
Date: Fri Sep 26 2014 - 14:18:55 EST
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On September 26, 2014 8:08:13 PM CEST, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:53:01PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> Would you like me to carry this in the audit tree, since I'm the one
>> broke it?
>guess you are asking Jonas, but it would make sense to me.
Yes, please take this via the audit tree.
>> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 09:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > openrisc:defconfig fails to build in next-20140926 with the
>> > In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
>> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function
>> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC'
>> > Fix by moving EM_OPENRISC to include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h.
>> > Fixes: ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for
>> > Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > v2: Only move EM_OPENRISC.
>> > Another possible solution for the problem would be to include
>> > in arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c. I had actually submitted a patch
>> > that fix back in August (maybe that is where I remembered the
>> > Wonder what happened with that patch.
>> > Would it make sense to drop EM_OR32 and replace it with EM_OPENRISC
>> > it is used ? binutils seems to suggest that EM_OPENRISC is the
>> > definition.
>> > arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
>> > include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h | 1 +
>> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
>> > index f02ea58..8884276 100644
>> > --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
>> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
>> > @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
>> > /* A placeholder; OR32 does not have fp support yes, so no fp regs
>for now. */
>> > typedef unsigned long elf_fpregset_t;
>> > -/* This should be moved to include/linux/elf.h */
>> > +/* EM_OPENRISC is defined in linux/elf-em.h */
>> > #define EM_OR32 0x8472
>> > -#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded
>> > /*
>> > * These are used to set parameters in the core dumps.
>> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
>> > index 01529bd..aa90bc9 100644
>> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
>> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
>> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>> > #define EM_V850 87 /* NEC v850 */
>> > #define EM_M32R 88 /* Renesas M32R */
>> > #define EM_MN10300 89 /* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
>> > +#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded
>> > #define EM_BLACKFIN 106 /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
>> > #define EM_TI_C6000 140 /* TI C6X DSPs */
>> > #define EM_AARCH64 183 /* ARM 64 bit */
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/