Re: [PATCH 1/2] DT: add binding for mxs regulator

From: Stefan Wahren
Date: Mon Sep 29 2014 - 02:01:31 EST

Hi Mark,

Am 28.09.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:59:47AM +0000, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> This patch adds the Device tree bindings for the Freescale MXS
>> on-chip regulators.
> Use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.

sorry i'm not sure what's wrong with the subject lines.

Did you expect "[PATCH 1/2] regulator: add binding for mxs regulator"?

>> +Required regulator properties:
>> +- compatible: Must be "fsl,mxs-regulator"
>> +- reg: Absolute physical address of the register set for the regulator
>> +
>> +Any regulator property defined as part of the core regulator
>> +binding, defined in regulator.txt, can also be used.
> While this should be using compatibles to identify which regulator is
> being supported note that the binding doesn't document the fact that the
> code makes regulator-name mandatory or what values are required.

Is the following better?

- fsl,mxs-regulator-vddd
- fsl,mxs-regulator-vdda
- fsl,mxs-regulator-vddio


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at