Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Quark: Add legacy_cache_size and TLB comments

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 01/10/14 01:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Bryan,
>
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>
> what are you trying to achieve by sending out patches faster than
> anyone can review?

Thomas.

That's not the intention at all.

> Doing this has an obvious outcome:
>
>    1) The patches you whip up 10 seconds after the review hits your
>       inbox are likely not to be well thought out. Neither are the
>       changelogs.
>
>       Just by skimming the lot I noticed at least two issues which you
>       just mechanically fixed up without applying any thought. I'm not
>       going to tell you, simply because you are starting to abuse and
>       waste my time.
>
>    2) Keeping #1 as your modus operandi will make sure that you get on
>       the backlog list of reviewers and maintainers and in the worst
>       case on the shitlist.

1)
OK, I take your point on the frequency.

2)
On the substance.
I'm certainly not trying to antagonise you here - I assumed you were 
*suggesting* to apply those comments directly ?
Which is why I updated the sent patches with your comments - since they 
seemed more descriptive anyway - and sent back to the list.


Thanks,
Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/