Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Sebastian Lackner
<sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +     testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp)       /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
>> +     jz 1f
>> +     pushq_cfi $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
>> +     popfq_cfi
>> +1:
>> +
>
> Do you think it makes sense to change the order here, so that no jump happens if
> NT is not set (which happens a bit more often, than the other way round)? Just a
> guess though, haven't measured if pipeline effects have such a big influence in this
> case. ;)
>

It should be immeasurable in a tight loop, since it will predict
correctly almost every time.  And, unless cfi state works across
.pushsection (does it?), getting the cfi annotations right will be
more complicated.

--Andy

-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/