Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review

[Jiri Slaby]

On 09/27/2014, 11:54 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> At Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700,
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release.
>>> There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
>>
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0
>
> Plus, this kernel passed my test.

On 09/29/2014, 06:52 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Hi, and thanks to all of you.

>> Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review
request.
>> It includes 245 patches instead of just 142.

It is because I went wild and already uploaded 3.12.30-rc1 (aka
performance release).

>> Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok.
>> Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending
changes ?
>> So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your
>> repository at kernel.org.

Yeah, it is fine. You will receive a 30-rc1 message in a minute. (And if
you tested the stable-queue already, no need to retest :).)

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/