[PATCH] Use phys_addr_t type for physical address (arm64)

From: Min-Hua Chen
Date: Wed Oct 01 2014 - 10:27:00 EST


Hi,

I found that valid_phys_addr_range does not use
phys_addr_t to describe physical address.
Is it better to change the type from unsigned long to phys_addr_t?

Thanks,
Min-Hua


Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen<orca.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
index e0ecdcf..f771e8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ extern void __iomem *ioremap_cache(phys_addr_t
phys_addr, size_t size);
* (PHYS_OFFSET and PHYS_MASK taken into account).
*/
#define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE
-extern int valid_phys_addr_range(unsigned long addr, size_t size);
+extern int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size);
extern int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t size);

extern int devmem_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
index 8ed6cb1..1d73662 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_pick_mmap_layout);
* You really shouldn't be using read() or write() on /dev/mem. This might go
* away in the future.
*/
-int valid_phys_addr_range(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
{
if (addr < PHYS_OFFSET)
return 0;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/