Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Provide a non-blocking SetVariable() operation

From: Matt Fleming
Date: Wed Oct 01 2014 - 12:12:06 EST


On Wed, 01 Oct, at 05:26:24PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> If you want to have this usable from NMI context, you need to convert
> efi_runtime_lock to a raw_spinlock_t.

Hmm.. I note that none of the spinlocks in the pstore code path that we
execute to get here are raw_spinlock_t. And that's the only code path
that calls this function.

They need to be raw_spinlock_t for -rt?

> Also, it would probably be a good idea to have some selftest like thing
> that actually calls this from NMI context, right?

Yeah probably, although that'd need to be a core pstore test since
there's nothing really interesting going on in
virt_efi_set_variable_nonblocking(), and it would be good to test it out
in the larger pstore context.

--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/