Re: [PATCH] staging: Add Xilinx Clocking Wizard driver
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed Oct 01 2014 - 14:58:55 EST
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:21:48AM -0700, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> +enum clk_wzrd_inp_clks {
> + wzrd_clk_in1,
> + wzrd_s_axi_aclk,
> + wzrd_clk_inp_max
> +};
> +
> +enum clk_wzrd_int_clks {
> + wzrd_clk_mul,
> + wzrd_clk_mul_div,
> + wzrd_clk_int_max
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct clk_wzrd:
> + * @clk_data: Clock data
> + * @nb: Notifier block
> + * @base: Memory base
> + * @clkin: Handle to input clocks
> + * @clks_internal: Internal clocks
> + * @clkout: Output clocks
> + * @speed_grade: Negated speed grade of the device
> + * @suspended: Flag indicating power state of the device
> + */
> +struct clk_wzrd {
> + struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
> + struct notifier_block nb;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + struct clk *clkin[wzrd_clk_inp_max];
> + struct clk *clks_internal[wzrd_clk_int_max];
There is no advantage to using these arrays here. It just makes the
code more complicated to look at:
before: clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul_div] = ...
after: clk_wzrd->mul_div = ...
> + struct clk *clkout[WZRD_NUM_OUTPUTS];
This array makes sense, though.
> + int speed_grade;
> + bool suspended;
suspended is always zero. Delete it.
> +};
> +#define to_clk_wzrd(_nb) container_of(_nb, struct clk_wzrd, nb);
> +
> +/* maximum frequencies for input/output clocks per speed grade */
> +static const unsigned long clk_wzrd_max_freq[] = {
> + 800000000UL,
> + 933000000UL,
> + 1066000000UL
> +};
> +
> +static int clk_wzrd_clk_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + unsigned long max;
> + struct clk_notifier_data *ndata = data;
> + struct clk_wzrd *clk_wzrd = to_clk_wzrd(nb);
> +
> + if (clk_wzrd->suspended)
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +
> + if (ndata->clk == clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_clk_in1])
> + max = clk_wzrd_max_freq[clk_wzrd->speed_grade - 1];
> + if (ndata->clk == clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk])
> + max = WZRD_ACLK_MAX_FREQ;
> +
> + switch (event) {
> + case PRE_RATE_CHANGE:
> + if (ndata->new_rate > max)
> + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> + case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
> + case ABORT_RATE_CHANGE:
> + default:
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_wzrd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int i, ret;
> + u32 reg;
> + unsigned long rate;
> + const char *clk_name;
> + struct clk_wzrd *clk_wzrd;
> + struct resource *mem;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> + clk_wzrd = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*clk_wzrd), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!clk_wzrd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, clk_wzrd);
> +
> + mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + clk_wzrd->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_wzrd->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(clk_wzrd->base);
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "speed-grade", &clk_wzrd->speed_grade);
> + if (!ret) {
> + clk_wzrd->speed_grade = -clk_wzrd->speed_grade;
> + if (clk_wzrd->speed_grade < 1 || clk_wzrd->speed_grade > 3) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "invalid speed grade\n");
Print what it was.
> + clk_wzrd->speed_grade = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_clk_in1] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "clk_in1");
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_clk_in1])) {
> + if (clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_clk_in1] != ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_in1 not found\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_clk_in1]);
> + }
> +
> + clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "s_axi_aclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk])) {
> + if (clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk] != ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "s_axi_aclk not found\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk]);
> + }
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk]);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "enabling s_axi_aclk failed\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + rate = clk_get_rate(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_s_axi_aclk]);
> + if (rate > WZRD_ACLK_MAX_FREQ) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "s_axi_aclk frequency too high\n");
Print what it was.
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_disable_clk;
> + }
> +
> + /* we don't support fractional div/mul yet */
> + reg = readl(clk_wzrd->base + WZRD_CLK_CFG_REG(0)) & WZRD_CLkFBOUT_FRAC_EN;
> + reg |= readl(clk_wzrd->base + WZRD_CLK_CFG_REG(2)) & WZRD_CLkOUT0_FRAC_EN;
> + if (reg)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "fractional div/mul not supported\n");
> +
> + /* register multiplier */
> + reg = (readl(clk_wzrd->base + WZRD_CLK_CFG_REG(0)) & WZRD_CLKFBOUT_MULT_MASK) >>
> + WZRD_CLKFBOUT_MULT_SHIFT;
> + clk_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s_mul", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> + if (!clk_name) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_disable_clk;
> + }
> + clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul] = clk_register_fixed_factor(
> + &pdev->dev, clk_name,
> + __clk_get_name(clk_wzrd->clkin[wzrd_clk_in1]),
> + 0, reg,1);
> + kfree(clk_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul])) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register fixed-factor clock\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul]);
> + goto err_disable_clk;
> + }
> +
> + /* register div */
> + reg = (readl(clk_wzrd->base + WZRD_CLK_CFG_REG(0)) &
> + WZRD_DIVCLK_DIVIDE_MASK) >> WZRD_DIVCLK_DIVIDE_SHIFT;
> + clk_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s_mul_div", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> + clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul_div] = clk_register_fixed_factor(
> + &pdev->dev, clk_name,
> + __clk_get_name(clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul]),
> + 0, 1, reg);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul_div])) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register divider clock\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul_div]);
> + goto err_rm_int_clk;
> + }
> +
> + /* register div per output */
> + for (i = WZRD_NUM_OUTPUTS - 1; i >= 0 ; i--) {
> + const char *clkout_name;
> + if (of_property_read_string_index(np, "clock-output-names", i,
> + &clkout_name)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "clock output name not specified\n");
Run checkpatch.pl --strict over this code.
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_rm_int_clks;
> + }
> + reg = (readl(clk_wzrd->base + WZRD_CLK_CFG_REG(2) + i * 12) &
> + WZRD_CLKOUT_DIVIDE_MASK) >> WZRD_CLKOUT_DIVIDE_SHIFT;
> + clk_wzrd->clkout[i] = clk_register_fixed_factor(&pdev->dev,
> + clkout_name, clk_name, 0, 1, reg);
Alignment is hard to look at.
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_wzrd->clkout[i])) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register divider clock\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(clk_wzrd->clkout[i]);
> + goto err_rm_int_clks;
> + }
The error handling for this loop should unregister ->clkout[i + 1] etc.
Why is does this loop count backwards, just out of curiosity?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/