Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Wed Oct 01 2014 - 15:50:26 EST
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The NT flag doesn't do anything in long mode other than causing IRET
> to #GP. Oddly, CPL3 code can still set NT using popf.
>
[...]
> +
> + /*
> + * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT
> + * ourselves. To save a few cycles, we can check whether
> + * NT was set instead of doing an unconditional popfq.
> + */
> + testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp) /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
> + jnz sysenter_fix_flags
> +sysenter_flags_fixed:
> +
Because this thread hasn't gone on long enough:
Do we need to clear IOPL here, too? With patch 2 applied, an IOPL !=
0 program can leak IOPL into another task. It should be cleared on
iret, sysexit (via popf) and sysret (directly), so this shouldn't
matter. Am I missing something?
Adding IOPL to the test will add no overhead for non-iopl-using tasks,
but it will slighly slow down 32-bit tasks that use iopl.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/