Am 02.10.2014 15:28, schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
Hi Richard
On 9/30/2014 1:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Fastmap can miss a PEB if it is in the protection queue
and not jet in the used tree.
Treat every protected PEB as used.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
index 2b0d8d6..2853a69 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
@@ -1195,6 +1195,19 @@ static int ubi_write_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi,
fm_pos += sizeof(*fec);
ubi_assert(fm_pos <= ubi->fm_size);
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i < UBI_PROT_QUEUE_LEN; i++) {
+ list_for_each_entry(wl_e, &ubi->pq[i], u.list) {
why not list_for_each_entry_safe?
Because we don't delete elements from this list while iterating over it.
+ fec = (struct ubi_fm_ec *)(fm_raw + fm_pos);
+
+ fec->pnum = cpu_to_be32(wl_e->pnum);
+ fec->ec = cpu_to_be32(wl_e->ec);
+
+ used_peb_count++;
+ fm_pos += sizeof(*fec);
+ ubi_assert(fm_pos <= ubi->fm_size);
Is fm_size ok with this addition or does it needs updating as well?
It is okay. The fastmap size calculation reserves enough space for all possible
PEBs.
Thanks,
//richard
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/