Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] enhance DMA CMA on x86

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:49:54PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 09/30/2014 07:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Whether the proposed patchset is the correct solution to support it is
> > a completely different question.
> 
> This patchset has been in mainline since 3.16 and has already caused
> regressions, so the question of whether this is the correct solution has
> already been answered.
> 
> > So either you stop this right now and help Akinobu to find the proper
> > solution 
> 
> If this is only a test platform for ARM parts then I don't think it
> unreasonable to suggest forking x86 swiotlb support into a iommu=cma

Not sure what you mean by 'forking x86 swiotlb' ? As in have SWIOTLB
work under ARM?

> selector that gets DMA mapping working for this test platform and doesn't
> cause a bunch of breakage.

I think you might want to take a look at the IOMMU_DETECT macros
and enable CMA there only if the certain devices are available.

That way the normal flow of detecting which IOMMU to use is still present
and will turn of CMA if there is no device that would use it.

> 
> Which is different than if the plan is to ship production units for x86;
> then a general purpose solution will be required.
> 
> As to the good design of a general purpose solution for allocating and
> mapping huge order pages, you are certainly more qualified to help Akinobu
> than I am.
> 
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/