Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Do not mark PTEs pte_numa when splitting huge pages

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You've also mentioned that while I can tell you if nothing dies, I can't
> really tell you if everything is working well. Is there a reasonable way
> to easily say if NUMA is working properly? Even something that would just
> tell me "your NUMA balancing seems to be sane" would be good.

So not having a NUMA machine (and not really wanting one), I can't
really test things like the migration even *working*.

But the easy/obvious test would be to run the autonuma benchmarks, and
verify that the performance is where it's expected to be and that the
migration actually works.

I think the "main" source site is

  https://gitorious.org/autonuma-benchmark

but haven't verified.

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/