Re: [RFC 5/7] soc: qcom: Add Shared Memory Driver

[Stephen Boyd]

On 09/29/14 17:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> +
> +#define GET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> +	(channel->rx_info_word ? \
> +		channel->rx_info_word->param : \
> +		channel->rx_info->param)
> +
> +#define GET_TX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> +	(channel->rx_info_word ? \
> +		channel->tx_info_word->param : \
> +		channel->tx_info->param)
> +
> +#define SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param, value) \
> +	(channel->rx_info_word ? \
> +		(channel->rx_info_word->param = value) : \
> +		(channel->rx_info->param = value))
> +
> +#define SET_TX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param, value) \
> +	(channel->rx_info_word ? \

Drive-by review: Should this be tx_info_word? Given that it works I
wonder why not just have a flag indicating if we should use word aligned
read/write vs. byte aligned.

> +		(channel->tx_info_word->param = value) : \
> +		(channel->tx_info->param = value))
> +


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/