Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for PRECDIST
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Oct 03 2014 - 00:02:31 EST
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:02:58AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on
> > > > > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags.
> > > >
> > > > What's magic about nehalem and westmere?
> > >
> > > I wasn't able to confirm their behavior explicitly, so I felt
> > > it best to leave them alone.
> > >
> > > But in principle adding the _FLAGS changes there too would
> > > make sense too.
> >
> > Yeah please do that patch ASAP, having PEBS behave differently across
> > uarchs is wrong.
>
> Ping!
Also, I have to NAK this patch for trivial style reasons: the
patch adds gobs of misaligned, misplaced spaces instead of using
proper tabs - and apparently that's not the first time Andi did
that to the constraints tables.
This is annoying and ineffective and Andi Kleen continues to
introduce trivial flaws into the kernel despite repeated
complaints and requests for him to use available tools to check
patch quality such as scripts/checkpatch.pl.
As a result I'm dropping most patches from Andi in the perf/core
pipeline and I will delay them to at least until v3.19 when I
might have more time to waste on reviewing trivially flawed
patches.
I only took this single patch:
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix minor race in box set up
which fixes a bug, and I've dropped all other patches from Andi.
Next time I see trivial flaws in Andi's patches I'll drop and
delay them for two cycles, not one, to give them ample time to be
improved.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/