Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] perf tools: parse the pmu event prefix and surfix

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:33:07PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> 
> > >
> > > +static int
> > > +comp_pmu(const void *p1, const void *p2) {
> > > +	struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu1 =
> > > +			(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *) p1;
> > > +	struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu2 =
> > > +			(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *) p2;
> > 
> > please keep it on one line, like:
> > 	const struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu1 = p1;
> > 	const struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu2 = p2;
> > 
> 
> 
> Removing (struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *) will cause compiler error as below.
> 
> util/parse-events.c:877:39: error: initialization discards âconstâ qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror]
>   struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu1 = p1;
> 
> If we keep (struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *), we may not keep it on one line. The line will over 80 characters. There will be error from checkpatch.pl.
> 
> 
> > > +	perf_pmu_events_list =
> > > +		malloc(sizeof(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol) * len);
> > 
> > please keep above on one line
> 
> If so, the line will over 80 characters. There will be error from checkpatch.pl.

AFAIK we are not that strict on this warning.. I think the current
notion is to keep the code easy to read with reasonable breakages
of this rule

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/