[PATCH v2 2/4] ima: no need to allocate entry for comment

[Dmitry Kasatkin]

If rule is a comment, there is no need to allocate entry.
Move checking for comment before allocating entry.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index cdc620b..bf232b9 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -694,6 +694,12 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
+	p = strsep(&rule, "\n");
+	len = strlen(p) + 1;
+
+	if (*p == '#')
+		return len;
+
 	entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entry) {
 		integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL,
@@ -703,14 +709,6 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
 
-	p = strsep(&rule, "\n");
-	len = strlen(p) + 1;
-
-	if (*p == '#') {
-		kfree(entry);
-		return len;
-	}
-
 	result = ima_parse_rule(p, entry);
 	if (result) {
 		kfree(entry);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/