Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
Date: Fri Oct 03 2014 - 11:07:14 EST
On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote:
Le 19 sept. 2014 à 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usual,
I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-300d
dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing
lists instead of each of the DT maintainers.
First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one common
node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and node
alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are moved
to the common node from one board specific node.
Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d which
is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I also
found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally,
there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is set
for two.
I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is nothing
important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have
already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do no
harm.
Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in
a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit
for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great.
I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch from the
series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'll be
able to test during next week.
Did you ever get a chance to test this series?
Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushed the
patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on
v3.17-rc1 to
https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/