Re: kobject_init and the zeroed-out-memory requirement
From: Jason Noakes
Date: Sun Oct 05 2014 - 18:13:47 EST
> No driver should be working with "raw" kobjects.
I don't agree, but it's irrelevant. If the functions are exported and
documented, the documentation should be complete.
> kobject_init() has been there for a very long time, and yes, we don't
> always have the best naming scheme in the kernel, that comes from
> evolution over the years.
If you ever want to rename it, drop me a line. I'll submit the patch
for that too :)
> Care to resend this in a format I can apply it in (i.e. without this
> discussion above the patch forcing me to edit the changelog)?
Sure.
--
~~ Jason J. Noakes
~~ jjnoakes@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/