Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] drm: rockchip: Add basic drm driver

[Andrzej Hajda]

On 10/07/2014 05:56 AM, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2014å09æ30æ 21:31, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
> Hi Andrzej,
>     Sorry for replying late, I have a vacation before.
>     Thanks for your review.
>> On 09/30/2014 03:03 PM, Mark Yao wrote:
>>> From: Mark yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
(...)
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> +static int rockchip_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
>>> +
>>> +	drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>>> +	list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
>>> +		int old_dpms = connector->dpms;
>>> +
>>> +		if (connector->funcs->dpms)
>>> +			connector->funcs->dpms(connector, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
>>> +
>>> +		/* Set the old mode back to the connector for resume */
>>> +		connector->dpms = old_dpms;
>>> +	}
>>> +	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rockchip_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
>>> +
>>> +	drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>>> +	list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
>>> +		if (connector->funcs->dpms)
>>> +			connector->funcs->dpms(connector, connector->dpms);
>>> +	}
>>> +	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	drm_helper_resume_force_mode(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rockchip_drm_sys_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +	pm_message_t message;
>>> +
>>> +	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	message.event = PM_EVENT_SUSPEND;
>>> +
>>> +	return rockchip_drm_suspend(drm_dev, message);
>> drm_dev can be NULL here, it can happen when system is suspended
>> before all components are bound. It can also contain invalid pointer
>> if after successfull drm initialization de-initialization happens for
>> some reason.
>>
>> Some workaround is to check for null here and set drvdata to null on
>> master unbind. But I guess it should be protected somehow to avoid races
>> in accessing drvdata.
> So, can I use the way that check for null here and set drvdata to null
> on master unbind?
> I don't know which way is better to protect somehow.

It seems to be a core problem, I have proposed some solution using drm
driver PM callbacks [1]
but it appears these callbacks are obsolete, so different solution
should be found. According to
Russel probably some extension of component framework.
As a temporary solution I guess null checks should work in most cases.

Regards
Andrzej


[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/3/60

>
> -Mark.
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rockchip_drm_sys_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	return rockchip_drm_resume(drm_dev);
>> Ditto.
>>
>> Regards
>> Andrzej
>>
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/