Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/17] mm: madvise MADV_USERFAULT

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:46:04AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Kirill A. Shutemov (kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 07:07:58PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > MADV_USERFAULT is a new madvise flag that will set VM_USERFAULT in the
> > > vma flags. Whenever VM_USERFAULT is set in an anonymous vma, if
> > > userland touches a still unmapped virtual address, a sigbus signal is
> > > sent instead of allocating a new page. The sigbus signal handler will
> > > then resolve the page fault in userland by calling the
> > > remap_anon_pages syscall.
> > 
> > Hm. I wounder if this functionality really fits madvise(2) interface: as
> > far as I understand it, it provides a way to give a *hint* to kernel which
> > may or may not trigger an action from kernel side. I don't think an
> > application will behaive reasonably if kernel ignore the *advise* and will
> > not send SIGBUS, but allocate memory.
> 
> Aren't DONTNEED and DONTDUMP  similar cases of madvise operations that are
> expected to do what they say ?

No. If kernel would ignore MADV_DONTNEED or MADV_DONTDUMP it will not
affect correctness, just behaviour will be suboptimal: more than needed
memory used or wasted space in coredump.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/