Re: [PATCH] net: fec: fix regression on i.MX28 introduced by rx_copybreak support
From: Lothar WaÃmann
Date: Wed Oct 08 2014 - 01:18:14 EST
Hi,
David Laight wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> > On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:19 +0200, Lothar Wamann wrote:
> > > commit 1b7bde6d659d ("net: fec: implement rx_copybreak to improve rx performance")
> > > introduced a regression for i.MX28. The swap_buffer() function doing
> > > the endian conversion of the received data on i.MX28 may access memory
> > > beyond the actual packet size in the DMA buffer. fec_enet_copybreak()
> > > does not copy those bytes, so that the last bytes of a packet may be
> > > filled with invalid data after swapping.
> > > This will likely lead to checksum errors on received packets.
> > > E.g. when trying to mount an NFS rootfs:
> > > UDP: bad checksum. From 192.168.1.225:111 to 192.168.100.73:44662 ulen 36
> > >
> > > Do the byte swapping and copying to the new skb in one go if
> > > necessary.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Wamann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> > > index 87975b5..eaaebad 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> > > @@ -339,6 +339,18 @@ static void *swap_buffer(void *bufaddr, int len)
> > > return bufaddr;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void *swap_buffer2(void *dst_buf, void *src_buf, int len)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > + unsigned int *src = src_buf;
> > > + unsigned int *dst = dst_buf;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(len, 4); i++, src++, dst++)
> > > + *dst = cpu_to_be32(*src);
> >
> > No need for the DIV :
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < len; i += sizeof(*dst), src++, dst++)
> > *dst = cpu_to_be32(*src);
> >
> > Also are you sure both src/dst are aligned to word boundaries, or is
> > this architecture OK with possible misalignment ?
>
> I wondered about that as well.
> I wouldn't have expected ppc to support misaligned transfers, and you'd also
> want to make sure that cpu_to_be(*src) was using a byte-swapping instruction.
> Hmmm... cpu_to_be() doesn't sound like the right 'swap' macro name.
>
??? So what is cpu_to_be32() then?
The new swap function is an exact copy of the original one already in
use except for the fact that it uses distinct source and destination
buffers.
Lothar WaÃmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | PascalstraÃe 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
GeschÃftsfÃhrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
___________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/