Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt: bindings: tps65217: add compatible property for subnodes

From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Oct 08 2014 - 09:30:40 EST


On Wed, 08 Oct 2014, Johannes Pointner wrote:

> 2014-10-08 12:47 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Wed, 08 Oct 2014, Johannes Pointner wrote:
> >
> >> 2014-10-06 23:22 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Johannes Pointner wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Add documentation for compatible property of subnodes.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Pointner <johannes.pointner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt | 7 ++++++-
> >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/tps65217-backlight.txt | 9 ++++++---
> >> >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt
> >> >> index 4f05d20..8ae3a3b 100644
> >> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65217.txt
> >> >> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properties:
> >> >> Optional properties:
> >> >> - ti,pmic-shutdown-controller: Telling the PMIC to shutdown on PWR_EN toggle.
> >> >>
> >> >> +Required subnode properties:
> >> >> +- compatible: "ti,tps65217-pmic"
> >> >> +
> >> >> The valid names for regulators are:
> >> >> tps65217: dcdc1, dcdc2, dcdc3, ldo1, ldo2, ldo3 and ldo4
> >> >>
> >> >> @@ -23,9 +26,11 @@ Example:
> >> >>
> >> >> tps: tps@24 {
> >> >> compatible = "ti,tps65217";
> >> >> + reg = <0x24>;
> >> >> ti,pmic-shutdown-controller;
> >> >>
> >> >> - regulators {
> >> >> + tps_pmic: regulators {
> >> >
> >> > How is the tps_pmic label used?
> >> >
> >> >> + compatible = "ti,tps65217-pmic";
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to see a '\n' here.
> >> I will add a newline here.
> >> >
> >> >> dcdc1_reg: dcdc1 {
> >> >> regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
> >> >> regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/tps65217-backlight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/tps65217-backlight.txt
> >> >> index 5fb9279..f92f154 100644
> >> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/tps65217-backlight.txt
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/tps65217-backlight.txt
> >> >> @@ -6,19 +6,22 @@ used to drive LEDs for use as backlights.
> >> >> Required properties:
> >> >> - compatible: "ti,tps65217"
> >> >> - reg: I2C slave address
> >> >> -- backlight: node for specifying WLED1 and WLED2 lines in TPS65217
> >> >> +- backlight: subnode for specifying WLED1 and WLED2 lines in TPS65217
> >> >> +
> >> >> +Required subnode properties:
> >> >> +- compatible: "ti,tps65217-bl"
> >> >> - isel: selection bit, valid values: 1 for ISEL1 (low-level) and 2 for ISEL2 (high-level)
> >> >> - fdim: PWM dimming frequency, valid values: 100, 200, 500, 1000
> >> >> - default-brightness: valid values: 0-100
> >> >>
> >> >> -Each regulator is defined using the standard binding for regulators.
> >> >>
> >> >> Example:
> >> >>
> >> >> tps: tps@24 {
> >> >> reg = <0x24>;
> >> >> compatible = "ti,tps65217";
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to see a '\n' here.
> >> I will add a newline here.
> >> >
> >> >> - backlight {
> >> >> + tps_bl: backlight {
> >> >
> >> > Same here. Is this label used?
> >> >
> >> >> + compatible = "ti,tps65217-bl";
> >> >> isel = <1>; /* 1 - ISET1, 2 ISET2 */
> >> >> fdim = <100>; /* TPS65217_BL_FDIM_100HZ */
> >> >> default-brightness = <50>;
> >> >
> >>
> >> Regarding the labels: The backlight label could be used like the
> >> following. I use it like this in my tests with the tilcdc panel driver
> >> which has a backlight support.
> >>
> >> panel {
> >> backlight = <&tps_bl>;
> >>
> >> panel-info {
> >> ac-bias = <255>;
> >> ac-bias-intrpt = <0>;
> >> dma-burst-sz = <16>;
> >> bpp = <32>;
> >> fdd = <0x80>;
> >> sync-edge = <0>;
> >> sync-ctrl = <1>;
> >> .
> >> .
> >> .
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if there could be actual use for the pmic label, but I
> >> thought if I add a label to backlight, I have to add one to the pmic
> >> too to keep it similar.
> >
> > No, not at all. If it's not used, you should remove it.
>
> OK, my mistake, sorry.
> I'll remove the pmic part of the patch and add the newline to the
> backlight documentation and resend the patch, if this is OK for you?

Yes, fine.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/