Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/26] 3.16.5-stable review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Oct 08 2014 - 12:34:49 EST


On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:49:47AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 06:32:52AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:39:50PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > > At Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:48:04 -0700,
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:47:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On 10/07/2014 04:19 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.5 release.
> > > > > >There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > >let me know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Responses should be made by Thu Oct 9 23:18:40 UTC 2014.
> > > > > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Build results:
> > > > > total: 136 pass: 136 fail: 0
> > > > > Qemu tests:
> > > > > total: 30 pass: 30 fail: 0
> > > > >
> > > > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> > > >
> > > > Wonderful, thanks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know.
> > >
> > > Plus, all these kernels passed my test.
> > >
> > > - Test Cases:
> > > - Build this kernel.
> > > - Boot this kernel.
> > > - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
> > >
> > > - Test Tool:
> > > https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
> > >
> > > - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
> > > http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz
> > >
> > > - Build Environment:
> > > - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
> > > - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
> > > - memory: 8GB
> > >
> > > - Test Target Environment:
> > > - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
> > > - # of vCPU: 2
> > > - memory: 2GB
> >
> > Glad to hear it, I was worried about 3.14, thanks for testing and
> > verifying I didn't mess anything up.
> >
> Anything special to be worried about for 3.14.20 that might warrant
> further / special testing ?

If it boots, it's good :)

> FWIW, I merged 3.14.19 into our target kernel. It does pass smoketest ;-).

Good, I merged a bunch of mm patches that Mel backported for 3.12. I
have more to do, was doing them in batches to try to make bisection
easier if problems show up.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/