Re: [RFC PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark

From: Tuan Bui
Date: Wed Oct 08 2014 - 18:15:05 EST

On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 21:57 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:28:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > If you compare an strace of AIM7 steady state and 'perf bench
> > > lock' steady state, is it comparable, i.e. do the syscalls and
> >
> > Isn't "lock" too generic? Isn't this stressing some specific lock and if
> > so shouldn't that be made abundantly clear in the 'perf bench' test name
> > and in the docs?
> yeah, and 'perf bench locking creat' just doesn't sound right.

Do you have any suggestion on how i should name it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at