Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] clk: Change clk_ops->determine_rate to return a clk_hw as the best parent

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/07/2014 08:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> This is in preparation for clock providers to not have to deal with struct clk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/clk/at91/clk-programmable.c |  4 ++--
>   drivers/clk/bcm/clk-kona.c          |  4 ++--
>   drivers/clk/clk-composite.c         |  9 +++++----
>   drivers/clk/clk.c                   | 11 +++++++----
>   drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c  |  2 +-
>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.c          | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c         | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>   drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c     |  4 ++--
>   drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-ar100.c |  4 ++--
>   include/linux/clk-provider.h        |  4 ++--
>   10 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

What is this based on? I see one in arch/mips/alchemy/common/clock.c as 
well.

Can you also update Documentation/clk.txt please?

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/